Infrastructure Advisory
CorePath Network Group helps IT and finance teams define data center requirements, compare qualified colocation providers, review pricing and contract terms, and coordinate renewals or migrations. Evaluations account for power, cooling, connectivity, compliance, resilience, location, capacity, and growth requirements.
A strong colocation decision begins with documented technical, operational, financial, and contractual requirements.
CorePath works with your team to review workloads, equipment, power density, cooling, connectivity, compliance obligations, recovery objectives, geographic needs, growth plans, and migration constraints.
These requirements provide a consistent basis for comparing facilities, provider proposals, service levels, pricing, and contract terms.
Organizations evaluating colocation should also compare public-cloud and hybrid alternatives through a consistent total-cost model.
A provider proposal reflects the inventory, commercial priorities, and services available from the provider issuing the proposal. A consistent market comparison helps buyers evaluate options against the same requirements.
CorePath compares qualified facilities and providers based on technical fit, connectivity, resilience, capacity, commercial terms, implementation requirements, and long-term flexibility.
Our standard sourcing advisory has no direct client advisory fee. CorePath Network Group receives compensation from the selected provider or distribution partner after deployment. The client retains final authority over every provider and contract decision.
CorePath does not own or operate data centers. Selected providers remain responsible for facility operations, service delivery, security controls, SLAs, and technical support.
Compare location, available capacity, power density, cooling, security, compliance documentation, carrier access, and expansion options.
Review space, power, cross-connects, connectivity, remote hands, escalators, taxes, implementation charges, and other recurring or one-time costs.
Evaluate current requirements, future density, expansion rights, reserved capacity, cooling support, and provider commitments.
Review available carriers, meet-me rooms, building entrances, conduit routes, cross-connects, cloud on-ramps, and upstream dependencies.
Compare renewal language, pricing escalators, service commitments, expansion rights, assignment terms, early termination provisions, and exit support.
Document dependencies, circuit delivery, equipment movement, rollback planning, access requirements, validation steps, and provider responsibilities.
When using Uptime Institute Tier terminology, confirm certification through the Uptime Institute Tier Certification directory. Use Tier III or Tier IV designations only for facilities with verified certification.
Document the current environment, business requirements, technical dependencies, capacity needs, risks, budget, and timing.
Identify facilities and providers matching the documented requirements. Compare each option through the same evaluation framework.
Review pricing, service commitments, contract flexibility, security documentation, implementation requirements, and provider responsibilities.
Support renewal, provider selection, contracting, circuit planning, migration preparation, and implementation milestones with the client and selected providers.
CorePath's colocation advisory is designed for organizations where infrastructure decisions carry real financial, operational, and compliance weight.
A colocation evaluation normally begins with the current agreement and amendments, recent invoices, facility and cabinet inventory, measured and committed power, equipment requirements, rack-density projections, carrier and cross-connect inventory, security and compliance requirements, growth forecasts, and important renewal or migration deadlines. The required information depends on the size and complexity of the environment.
CorePath documents the organization’s technical, operational, financial, security, and timing requirements before comparing providers. Qualified options are reviewed through the same framework, including facility location, power, cooling, capacity, carrier availability, physical-path diversity, compliance documentation, service commitments, pricing, escalators, contract flexibility, implementation requirements, and long-term fit.
Begin the review approximately 9 to 12 months before the current agreement expires. Start earlier for multi-site environments, large equipment moves, high-density requirements, new carrier circuits, complex compliance reviews, or projects requiring substantial migration planning. The notice deadline should be confirmed before provider discussions begin.
For standard sourcing engagements, CorePath Network Group receives compensation from the selected provider or distribution partner after deployment. The client pays no direct advisory fee for this sourcing model and retains final authority over provider and contract decisions.
CorePath Network Group helps organizations compare colocation facilities, provider proposals, connectivity options, commercial terms, renewals, and migration requirements through an independent sourcing process.
Our standard sourcing advisory has no direct client advisory fee. CorePath receives compensation from the selected provider or distribution partner after deployment.
Request an Infrastructure Audit